Starbucks' legal representative asserted that the impostors were attempting to gather information from the public for non-existent Starbucks franchise opportunities in India. In response, Google LLC's counsel expressed no objection to the relief sought by Starbucks, as long as the suspended URLs were directly linked to the issues raised in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Upon Starbucks' counsel confirming that the listed URLs in the complaint specifically pertained to Google Forms collecting information for Starbucks franchises, the Court issued an order for the suspension of these URLs within a week.

Starbucks was represented by Advocates Rima Majumdar and Shilpi Sinha.

Google LLC was represented by Advocates Neel Mason, Vihan Dang, Ujjawal Bhargava and Pragya Jain.

Advocates Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, Srish Kumar Mishra, Alexander Mathai Paikaday and Krishnan V appeared for the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.

Advocate Chhavi Arora represented National Internet Exchange of India.