In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court, bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, has strongly criticized the Delhi government for its failure to expedite funds exceeding Rs 1200 Crores for four crucial projects. These projects aim to establish 255 courtrooms in the national capital region, addressing a pressing need for expanded judicial infrastructure.
Despite the approval of plans for three projects on March 25, 2021 (District Centre, Shastri Park; Karkardooma Complex; and Sector 26 Rohini), and one on September 26, 2019 (Rouse Avenue establishments), the court expressed disappointment that the approval for funds regarding these plans is still pending.
The bench, comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, underscored the current deficit of 188 courtrooms in comparison to the authorized capacity and 114 courtrooms concerning the current operational capacity. Moreover, the court observed a significant shortage of residential units, with 539 units falling short of the sanctioned strength and 465 units concerning the existing workforce.
Expressing dissatisfaction, the bench stated that there is no justifiable reason for the Government of NCTD to delay proposals for such an extended period. This delay has resulted in a severe shortage of courtrooms, and with the anticipation of new recruits in the near future, the deficiency in judicial infrastructure is expected to worsen. The bench directed that the situation should be promptly addressed.
Furthermore, the Acting Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court has been instructed to convene a meeting today with key officials including the Chief Secretary, GNCTD; Principal Secretary (Law); Principal Secretary (Finance); and Secretary in charge of PWD to discuss and resolve the matter. During the meeting, a comprehensive assessment of the necessary measures that the Government of NCTD must undertake to fulfill all legitimate demands of the High Court will be conducted. The bench has scheduled a review of the matter for December 14th.
Senior Advocate Wasim Quadri, representing the Government of NCTD, has been tasked with informing the court about the sanctions made and the actions taken to release funds for pending projects in the interim period. The bench emphasized the expectation that this compliance be done promptly and that the court be informed of the decisions and sanctions made in the meantime. This matter arose during the hearing of a case related to appointments and infrastructure in district courts.
Case: MALIK MAZHAR SULTAN & ANR. vs. U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS,
Civil Appeal No(s).1867/2006.
Click to read/download judgment.
