Supreme Court has directed members of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), including its president Adhish C Aggarwala, to submit suggestions for further reforms in the election process of the lawyers' body. The move comes as the Court seeks to address concerns raised about the eligibility criteria for voters.

A bench consisting of Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Dutta considered an application filed by a bar association member, represented by Advocate-on-Record Pravir Choudhary, seeking relaxation of norms determining voter eligibility. The Court, while taking note of suggestions offered by former SCBA president Vikas Singh, emphasized its commitment to improving the election process.

SCBA president Adhish C Aggarwala initially expressed resistance, asserting that the association's executive committee was active and would consider any amendments submitted through a requisition endorsed by at least 150 members. Aggarwala stated that the court's role came into play only when the executive committee failed to act on requisitions, citing a past instance where a court-appointed implementation committee was involved.

Justice Kant acknowledged Aggarwala's points and clarified the Court's interest in encouraging positive reforms suggested by SCBA members. The dialogue continued, with Aggarwala highlighting the importance of adhering to the association's bye-laws for submitting suggestions and requisitions.

Justice Kant acknowledged the expertise of the legal community and indicated the Court's intention to consider suggestions aimed at improving the institution. Aggarwala further argued that the application seeking electoral reforms had become irrelevant after the 2023 elections in May.

However, the Court persisted in seeking suggestions and relevant rules and procedures from the SCBA. Justice Kant underlined the collaborative nature of the effort and emphasized that all members of the Bar were effectively acting as amicus curiae (friends of the court) in the case.

Aggarwala eventually agreed to file an affidavit on behalf of the SCBA, but noted the association's stance on maintaining the status quo. The bench clarified that they were not interfering with the general body's decisions but were open to considering any improvements suggested.

The backdrop of the case traces back to a 2011 Supreme Court ruling that upheld certain amendments related to voter eligibility for SCBA elections, emphasizing the "one bar one vote" principle. The recent proceedings revolve around concerns raised by a member regarding the eligibility criteria, especially in light of changing circumstances such as virtual proceedings and security system upgrades.