"Plea filed before the Supreme Court challenging the internet ban imposed in Manipur, a state in India, since May 3. The ban was implemented in response to violence that broke out in the state. The petitioners argue that despite the situation de-escalating, the government has repeatedly issued statewide internet shutdown orders."

The plea highlights the negative consequences of the internet ban, including fear, anxiety, helplessness, and frustration among the residents. It has also strained personal, professional, and social relationships and brought economic activities to a standstill. People have been unable to communicate with loved ones or colleagues, send children to school, access bank accounts, make payments, obtain essential supplies and medicines, and more.

The petitioners argue that the internet ban violates the fundamental rights of freedom of speech and freedom to carry on trade and occupation. They state that the orders do not provide valid reasons within the scope of Article 19(2) of the Constitution and therefore violate the Telecom Suspension Rules. They contend that the ban does not serve a legitimate goal and lacks a direct nexus with the purpose of maintaining law and order in the present situation.

Furthermore, the petitioners argue that the notifications regarding the internet ban have not been published on any website or social media platforms, preventing residents from making alternative arrangements or challenging the ban.

The petition requests the restoration of internet services in all districts and the publication of the suspension orders and the findings of the Review Committee.

It's important to note that the outcome of this plea will depend on the decision of the Supreme Court.