The Supreme Court recently emphasized its stance on hate speech, stating that regardless of the source, it will be treated uniformly under the law. During the hearing of various petitions, including one addressing hate speech following communal violence, the division bench led by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SVN Bhatti adjourned the session to address other matters but reaffirmed their commitment to tackling hate speech. Justice Khanna referenced the Tehseen Poonawalla guidelines on hate speech compliance.

A counsel raised concerns about provocative slogans raised during a rally in Kerala, to which Justice Khanna reiterated that the law applies to hate speech from any side and further discussion was unnecessary. Advocate Nizam Pasha expressed the hope that all parties stand united against hate speech. The court later adjourned, instructing written submissions to be filed a day before the next hearing.

The court previously proposed a plan involving state Director Generals of Police forming committees to assess hate speech complaints and provide directions to investigators. These committees would meet within specific timelines and review ongoing cases. The court allowed the petitioners to approach the police officers designated under the 2018 Tehseen Poonawalla judgment, which aimed to prevent mob lynching.

The case, titled "Shaheen Abdullah v. Union of India & Ors. | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2022," underscores the court's ongoing efforts to combat hate speech. By promoting uniform treatment of hate speech, suggesting committee formations, and endorsing the Poonawalla guidelines, the Supreme Court aims to prevent hate speech effectively. The court's proactive measures demonstrate its commitment to addressing this issue in the country.