RAJASTHAN: Yesterday, in the matter of Suo Motu v. State of Rajasthan, the Rajasthan High Court took suo moto cognizance of a strike done by Bar Associations on account of a lawyer's murder in Jodhpur City. The bench was headed by Acting Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Vijay Bishnoi said-

"abstention from work by anyone including the office bearers of any of the Bar Association is not in accordance with the law and is in violation of the Supreme Court orders passed from time to time."

“We reiterate that any attempt made to obstruct any lawyer or litigant from entering the Court and appearing in the Court to argue the matter shall be viewed strictly and they shall be treated as an act of obstruction in the administration of justice and suitable action would be initiated against such persons,” it cautioned

M.S. Singhvi submitted that the strike was done against the Supreme Court's judgement in Harish Uppal v. Union of India & Ors. (2003) 2 SCC 45. He also mentioned that the Court of a threatening letter by the office bearer of the Bar Association, stating that he is not cooperating in the agitation. This indeed is a serious matter, the bench remarked, directing that the alleged letter be placed on court record. "Necessary directions are required to be issued," it said.

State Bar Council member Suresh Chandra Shrimali, submitted that -

 that lawyers are agitating because there is a serious issue of protection, especially in the view of the incident. Additional Solicitor General, R.D. Rastogi suggested that attempts must be made to resolve the issue by deliberation and discussion among various stakeholders.

He also requested the court to resolve the isssue.

the next date of hearing is on 2nd March, 2023.