Punjab & Haryana High Court has upheld the acquittal of the accused in a high-profile abetment to suicide case from 2002. The court declared that a woman's suicide in her matrimonial home cannot automatically establish the liability of her husband and in-laws for harassment and abetment.

The case involved the tragic suicide of a woman in her matrimonial home due to alleged harassment over dowry demands. The accused, who were charged based on a complaint filed by the woman's father, had been acquitted by the trial court in 2006.

Justice N.S. Shekhawat, presiding over the case, emphasized that merely insulting the deceased or subjecting her to abusive language or maltreatment did not constitute abetment of suicide. The prosecution was required to present sufficient evidence indicating that the accused intended to instigate the woman to take her own life.

The court further stated that there was a lack of concrete or conclusive evidence against the in-laws and the husband to prove their involvement in the crime. Abetment entails a mental process of instigating or intentionally aiding someone to commit a specific act. Therefore, without a positive act on the part of the accused to incite or assist in suicide, a conviction cannot be sustained under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The appeal filed by the State against the trial court's acquittal of the in-laws and husband was heard by the High Court. The prosecution alleged that the deceased's husband had demanded dowry and threatened her with physical abuse if the money was not provided. The family of the deceased claimed that she had informed them about the harassment she faced from her husband's family during their visit approximately one week before her death.

The prosecution argued that the trial court had failed to properly consider the evidence and requested the reversal of the acquittal. However, Justice Shekhawat noted that the deceased's father admitted that no complaints of maltreatment or misbehavior were made by his daughter during the 18 years of their marriage. The court observed that the prosecution witnesses had made vague and general allegations against the accused, which did not hold up under cross-examination.

The court concluded that the mere fact of the wife committing suicide in her matrimonial home does not automatically make her in-laws and husband liable for harassment and abetment to suicide. The ruling emphasized the importance of establishing mens rea (intent to commit the offense) to convict someone under Section 306 IPC.

This judgment by the Punjab & Haryana High Court sets a precedent regarding cases of abetment to suicide, highlighting the necessity of concrete evidence and intent to prove the accused's guilt.

Case Title: "State of Haryana v. Darshan Lal and another."

Click Here To Read