Yesterady, Bombay High Court asked the CBI to stop “playing hide and seek” after the agency sought vacation of an earlier order granting interim protection to IRS officer Sameer Wankhede in the Cordelia cruise ‘drug bust' bribery case.

A division bench comprising Justices AS Gadkari and SG Dige directs the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for claiming that they may want to arrest Mr Wankhede in future if he does not cooperate in their probe but not telling the court if it has reached the conclusion that his arrest is required.

Further, the Court said CBI's arguments were creating serious doubts in the minds of the court. It also directed the agency to produce its case diary on the next date of the hearing – June 28 – to show the progress in the investigation.

Before the Hon'ble Court the CBI sought vacation of an earlier order passed by the court directing that no coercive action be taken against Wankhede, the former zonal director of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB).

Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer Mr Wankhede and four others have been accused of seeking a bribe of ₹ 25 crore from actor Shah Rukh Khan for not implicating his son Aryan in the Cordelia cruise ‘drug bust' case.

The CBI registered a first information report (FIR) against Mr Wankhede and others in May on the basis of a written complaint issued to them by the NCB.

The bench on Friday asked what coercive action the CBI wants to take against Mr Wankhede when it has already issued a notice under Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) section 41A (directing the accused to appear for statement) and when Wankhede has already appeared before the agency seven times.

CBI's advocate Kuldeep Patil said the agency ought to be given a free hand. “Arrest is the prerogative of the agency. What if in future he (Wankhede) does not cooperate,” Patil said.

The bench, however, noted that once notice under section 41A is given that means the agency does not have any intention to arrest.

“How can you (CBI) anticipate? Has the agency reached its conclusion that arrest is required?” Justice Gadkari asked.

“Why are you (CBI) shying from telling us? Please don't play this game of hide and seek. CBI is a premiere agency of this country,” the court added.

CBI's arguments for seeking the vacation of the no coercive order indicate that it wants to arrest Wankhede, said the HC. "Your arguments are raising serious doubts in our minds. We want to see your case diary,” Justice Gadkari said.

The court went on to say, “Once 41A notice is issued where is the question of arrest? Is 41A notice just a charade,” asked HC, asserting that the CBI has to openly say that it has reached a conclusion that Wankhde's arrest is required.

Patil said as of today, CBI has not reached a conclusion.