The Kerala High Court recently declined to dismiss the criminal proceedings against the printer, publisher, and former Chief Editor of Rashtra Deepika Publications, Kottayam, for revealing the identity of the survivor in the 2017 actress assault case.
Justice A. Badharudeen observed that although the Malayalam newspaper did not explicitly mention the survivor-actress's name, the details disclosed in the report were sufficient to identify her.
The Court stated that the proceedings cannot be dismissed, as the elements required to constitute an offence under Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code (disclosure of the identity of victims of certain offences, including rape) were prima facie present in this case.
"On reading the publication effected, which led to registration of this crime, as extracted hereinabove, it could be gathered that necessary inputs to disclose the identity of the victim in Crime No.297/2017 [actress assault case], alleging commission of offence under Section 376 [rape] of the IPC, were published," the Court said in its order.
In 2017, the survivor-actress was allegedly abducted and sexually assaulted in a moving vehicle by multiple individuals, reportedly orchestrated by Malayalam cine actor Dileep. The trial is currently ongoing before the Ernakulam District and Sessions Court.
Fr. Joseph Kuzhinjalil and Fr. Boby Alex, the printer, publisher, and former Chief Editor of Rashtra Deepika Publications, were accused of disclosing the actress's identity in the December 20, 2017 edition of the Rashtra Deepika Evening Daily. They sought to have the proceedings against them quashed, claiming that the publication did not reveal any details that could directly or indirectly identify the actress.
However, the Additional Director General of Prosecution (ADGP) argued that while the actress's name was not explicitly mentioned, the report, when read in full, made her identity apparent. The High Court reviewed the report and agreed with the ADGP's assessment.
"Going by the relevant portion of the publication, though the same, in no way, disclosed the name of the victim to the reader of the news, but necessary inputs to identify the victim...would give indication to the identity of the victim," the Court noted.
The Court also noted that the elements required to constitute an offence under Section 228A(1) of the IPC encompass not only the printing or publishing of the survivor's name but also the publication of "any matter which may make known the identity" of the survivor or victim.
"In fact, the Chief Editor or the Editor and printer and publisher, are persons in the ordinary course responsible for selecting the news items, are alleged to have committed the offence," the Court noted.
Therefore, the Court refused to quash the proceedings against the petitioners.
The petitioners were represented by Advocates Jomy George, R Padmaraj, Deepak Mohan, Chitra N Das, Rishab S and Rona Ann Siby.
ADGP Grashious Kuriakose appeared for the State.
Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy