Allahabad High Court has left the public stunned by denying protection to an interfaith couple engaged in a live-in relationship, directly contradicting their expectations based on the Supreme Court's perceived stance on such arrangements.

Contrary to popular belief, the bench comprising Justices Sangeeta Chandra and Narendra Kumar Johari vehemently declared that the Supreme Court does not promote or endorse live-in relationships, despite recognizing them as a social reality. This unexpected revelation has left many puzzled and wondering about the true position of the apex court on this matter.

The court's firm stand on upholding the institution of marriage and its assertion that the law has always favored this traditional union has taken the public by surprise. While the Supreme Court's acknowledgment of live-in relationships was seen as a step towards modernity and acceptance, the Allahabad High Court's pronouncement has shattered those hopes and raised questions about the true intentions of the judiciary.

The court's insistence that the writ jurisdiction of High Courts should not be utilized to settle disputes between private parties has come as a shock to those who believed that seeking legal protection in such cases was an available option. This unexpected limitation on the power of the Writ Court has sparked debates and discussions among legal experts and the general public alike.

Furthermore, the court's suggestion that live-in relationship issues should be resolved socially rather than through legal intervention has raised eyebrows and caused astonishment. This departure from conventional expectations has left individuals wondering about the role of the judiciary in shaping societal norms and protecting individual rights.

The Allahabad High Court's dismissal of the plea for protection by the interfaith couple, along with its reasoning that the application was fictitious and lacked proper verification, has created a sense of disbelief among those who believed in the judiciary's commitment to safeguarding personal liberties and providing justice.

Overall, the unexpected stance taken by the Allahabad High Court in this case has left the public bewildered, challenging their assumptions about the Supreme Court's position on live-in relationships and raising doubts about the role of the judiciary in shaping modern society.

Case Title: Kiran Rawat & Anr v State
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3310 of 2023.