In response to a legal challenge against his public office position due to alleged remarks opposing Sanatana Dharma, Udhayanidhi Stalin, a Tamil Nadu Minister and DMK leader, has explained that the petition against him is based on ideological differences. The petitioner is associated with a Hindu right-wing organization.

Udhayanidhi's legal representative, Senior counsel P Wilson, argued that Article 25 of the Constitution, which ensures the freedom to practice and promote religion, also encompasses the right of individuals to practice and promote atheism. Wilson asserted that when Article 25 is considered alongside Article 19(1)(A) of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of expression, it unequivocally safeguards the Minister's right to free speech. He made this submission before Justice Anita Sumanth during the legal proceedings on Monday.

The Hindu Munnani, a right-wing organization, had filed a "quo warranto" petition, challenging Udhayanidhi's eligibility to hold public office. This legal action was initiated in response to Udhayanidhi's alleged comments against Sanatana Dharma at an event that took place last month.

Wilson also argued that the petitioners had brought this case against Udhayanidhi because the DMK, which he represents, is fundamentally opposed to their own ideology. He mentioned that the DMK stands for Dravidian ideology, emphasizing self-respect, equality, rational thinking, and unity. In contrast, he suggested that the opposing group advocates division based on caste.

The judge has scheduled the next hearing for October 31. During this hearing, the petitioners have been instructed to provide the invitation to the event where Udhayanidhi is said to have made the controversial remarks, as well as a list of individuals who attended the meeting.