Supreme Court of India Rejected Petition Seeking Guidelines for Live-in-Relationship

Supreme Court of India Rejected Petition Seeking Guidelines for Live-in-Relationship

Today, in the matter of Mamta Rani vs Union of India, the Supreme Court of India rejected a Petition seeking to form Guidelines for the registration of live-in relationships and for the social security of citizens who are in such relationships.

"Are you trying to foster the security of these people or not let people be in live-in relationships? Costs should be imposed on these petitions. Just hare-brained petitions; that is all," the CJI remarked before dismissing the plea.

The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices PS Narasimha and JB Pardiwala said that the petition questioned the intent of the petitioner.
 
The Petition was filed by Adv, Mamta Rani seeking social equality and security in Live-in-Relationships. In the Petition, the petitioner submitted that the failure to register live-in partnerships violates the constitutional rights to live freely (Article 19) and the right to protection of life (Article 21) and personal liberty.

"Time and again this Hon’ble Court has been the protector of the live-in partners and has passed a numerous number of judgments which is having the effect of giving protection to the members of the live-in partnership be it the women, men or even the children born out of such relationship," the plea said.

The petitioner also talked about the increasing crime rate by live-in partners, including major crimes like rape and murder, due to the absence of rules and guidelines covering live-in partnerships.

Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy