Supreme Court has placed significant emphasis on the accountability of individuals using social media, highlighting the need for them to be acutely aware of the potential consequences of their actions. This pivotal case revolved around S Ve Shekher, a multifaceted figure encompassing roles as an actor, playwright, and former legislator. Shekher's attempt to secure exemption from charges stemming from a derogatory post aimed at female journalists on Facebook in April 2018 formed the crux of the legal proceedings.

Shekher's defense hinged on his assertion that he accidentally disseminated the offensive content due to having applied eye drops earlier on the same day. However, this explanation was swiftly dismissed by a panel helmed by Justice Bhushan R Gavai, a stance bolstered by the participation of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra. The bench effectively countered Shekher's argument by underscoring that the utilization of social media is a voluntary act, thereby urging users to exercise prudence and thoughtfulness in their online interactions.

Representing Shekher, legal counsel S Nagamuthu underscored his client's advanced age of 73 and underscored his expression of contrition before the Tamil Nadu high court. Nagamuthu fervently pleaded for leniency, contending that the incident represented an isolated lapse induced by the use of eye drops.

Furthermore, Nagamuthu emphasized that Shekher possesses profound respect for women and female journalists. Despite these impassioned pleas, the court remained resolute in its decision, unyielding to the appeals for a more lenient outcome.