In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India has taken a stern stance against the misuse of internet media platforms in matters concerning pending cases in courts. This proactive approach stems from concerns over messages, comments, and articles that have the potential to undermine the integrity of judicial proceedings.

A notable instance highlighting this concern involved Justice Aniruddha Bose (now retired) and Justice Bela Trivedi's bench, which initiated contempt proceedings against All India United Democratic Front MLA Karimuddin Barbhuiya in Assam. 

The issue arose due to Barbhuiya's posting of misleading posts on Facebook related to a case. Despite the decision in this case being reserved, the Supreme Court's intervention underscores the gravity with which such actions are viewed.

Speaking about the misuse of internet media platforms, the bench expressed concern, saying, "Although we are quite strong in terms of bearing any criticism or responsibility on our shoulders but there is a serious need to consider comments or posts made in the context of pending cases in courts with seriousness in the context of the right to freedom of expression and speech, which tends to weaken the jurisdiction of courts or interfere in the judicial process."

The misuse of internet media platforms has become a growing concern, with comments and posts often being made without proper context or with the intent to distort facts. The SC bench's concern is not unfounded, as such actions can influence public opinion, create biases, and ultimately impact the fair dispensation of justice.

The bench also stated that it is noteworthy that the legal profession inherently involves robust debates and arguments, with lawyers frequently reacting to arguments made by judges during proceedings. This dynamic exchange is a fundamental aspect of the legal system, reflecting the adversarial nature of litigation. However, the court's vigilance extends to ensuring that such exchanges remain within the bounds of legal decorum and do not stray into misrepresenting facts or casting aspersions on the judiciary.

In addition, the bench issued a contempt notice to Barbhuiya and directed them to appear in court. The next hearing in this case will take place four weeks from now.

Case: Aminul Haque Laskar vs Karim Uddin Barbhuiya and ors.