The recent observation by the Goa bench of the Bombay High Court emphasized that it's unfair to label either parent as an adversary to their child. The single-headed bench of Justice Prakash Naik highlighted the crucial necessity of a child to receive the love and affection from both parents.

The Court emphasized the indispensable need for a child to receive love and care from both parents, stating that it's unjust to claim that a father is incapable of providing love, care, and protection. Furthermore, acknowledging the presence of the mother at the child's residence, the Court emphasized the importance of the child fostering connections and bonding with both parents.

The Court acknowledged the child's age, approximately three years and five months, and deemed it appropriate for the mother to have substantial custody during this phase. However, the Court firmly asserted that the father should not be denied visitation rights and weekend custody, ensuring his continued involvement in the child's life.