Lawyers seek apology from Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay for insulting Advocate General

Lawyers seek apology from Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay for insulting Advocate General

More than 250 lawyers have collectively signed a letter directed to Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam of the Calcutta High Court, expressing their strong disapproval on remarks made by Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay towards West Bengal Advocate General Kishore Datta on January 25.

Last week, an incident occurred during Justice Gangopadhyay's proceedings on a case related to a caste certificate scam. This case had previously triggered a contentious disagreement between the single judge and a division bench presided over by Justice Soumen Sen.

In their letter advocates asserted that during a hearing Justice Gangopadhyay reportedly made multiple defamatory statements against Advocate General Kishore Datta. The lawyers further emphasized that Justice Gangopadhyay's comments were unwarranted and constituted a breach of decorum, asserting that he had exceeded acceptable boundaries by directing insults and insinuations towards the Advocate General.

"Whatever has fallen from the Hon'ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay on 25th January targeting the Learned Advocate General is unacceptable to the entire body of advocates practicing in the State of West Bengal," it was stated further.

The lawyers have appealed to Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam to promptly take measures to restore the honor and dignity of the Court. They have specifically requested that an apology be sought from Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay in order to address the alleged disrespect and uphold the integrity of the judiciary. Meanwhile, the case related to the caste certificate scam, which had sparked the contentious exchange, was transferred to the Supreme Court yesterday.
 
The issue originates from a petition filed in the High Court alleging the issuance of fake caste certificates in West Bengal. Initially assigned to Justice Gangopadhyay, he directed a CBI inquiry into the matter. However, a division bench comprising Justices Soumen Sen and Uday Kumar promptly stayed this order on the same day. Despite the stay order from the division bench, Justice Gangopadhyay went ahead to facilitate the transfer of the case papers to the CBI on the same afternoon. He noted that there was no communication from the state counsel regarding the stay order by the division bench.
 
During a hearing, it was reported that the single judge, Justice Gangopadhyay, allegedly insulted Advocate General Datta. In his order dated January 25, Justice Gangopadhyay also claimed that Justice Sen had summoned another judge of the Calcutta High Court, Justice Amrita Sinha, to his chambers. In this meeting, Justice Sen allegedly conveyed that Trinamool Congress leader Abhishek Banerjee had a political future that should not be disrupted through judicial orders. The Supreme Court took cognisance of the rift a day later and subsequently issued a stay on the proceedings before both the single-judge and division benches of the High Court.
 
 
Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy