Highlighting the deceitful tactic of honey-trapping, likened to a spider's web ensnaring its prey, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has urged for profound reflection and increased awareness regarding this issue.

Justice Anoop Chitkara emphasized that the directive was crucial, considering how honey-trapping is frequently utilized either for espionage purposes or personal advantage,involving seduction to manipulate individuals into compromising situations.

During the hearing, Justice Chitkara presided over a petition filed by a female police official, who arrest in a corruption case filed at Farukhnagar police station in Gurugram district. The official stood accused of affiliating with a similar group and allegedly extorting money from a complainant involved in a case.

Justice Chitkara highlighted the legislature's implementation of "highly stringent laws" designed to safeguard women from criminals, and individuals disrespecting womanhood. Yet, he expressed concern that individuals, like the petitioner, misused these laws, unfairly implicating innocent men in their schemes.

He emphasized the wider societal impact of honey-trapping, noting that its practice could result in a gradual erosion of trust, fostering heightened suspicion among individuals. This could lead to a more guarded approach, impeding the development of authentic connections and collaborative efforts. Furthermore, it could significantly disrupt the foundation of healthy relationships.

He observed: “Given the historical and cultural fabric of the society, crimes against women have time and again shocked the collective conscience of our society. However, in cases where the ‘victim narrative’ is fabricated, as a ploy used by maliciousness of some women to threaten or harass innocent men and take advantage of our criminal justice system, serious consideration and sensitisation is required”.

In denying the anticipatory bail plea, Justice Chitkara underscored the devastating repercussions of false accusations of molestation or rape on a man's psychological, professional, and personal life. He emphasized that the detrimental effects of such labeling on an upright and rational man's psyche and character were immeasurable. The petitioner's actions had resulted in such an outcome, reflecting the gravity of the situation.