Hindu parties seek ASI survey of Gyanvapi Mosque's 'Shivling' in Kashi Vishwanath case

Hindu parties seek ASI survey of Gyanvapi Mosque's 'Shivling' in Kashi Vishwanath case

In the longstanding legal battle over the Gyanvapi Mosque-Kashi Vishwanath Temple site, Hindu petitioners have approached the Supreme Court seeking permission for the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to conduct a detailed survey of an object discovered within the mosque premises. This object, purportedly resembling a Shivling, has become a focal point in the dispute between Hindu and Muslim parties.

The application submitted by the Hindu petitioners contends that the alleged Shivling, surrounded by modern constructions, holds religious significance and warrants thorough examination. They argue that the construction around the Shivling was deliberately erected to conceal its true features, such as the Peeth and Pithika, which could shed light on its origin and significance.

Earlier, the ASI had conducted a survey of the mosque premises using non-invasive technology, excluding the area around the alleged Shivling. However, their subsequent report confirmed the existence of a Hindu temple beneath the mosque. Building upon this revelation, the Hindu parties seek to extend the survey to include the Shivling and its surroundings, emphasizing the need for scientific scrutiny to ascertain its true nature.

This latest plea adds to the complex legal saga that began with a civil suit filed by Hindu worshippers in 1991, seeking the right to worship within the mosque premises. Despite challenges, including a recent rejection by the Allahabad High Court of the Muslim side's plea contesting the suit's maintainability, the dispute continues to revolve around the contested identity and history of the site.

The Supreme Court, having previously intervened to address procedural matters and uphold the ASI survey, now faces the task of adjudicating on the Hindu parties' request to unfreeze the survey of the Shivling. The outcome of this latest legal maneuver could have far-reaching implications for the ongoing dispute and the broader discourse surrounding religious heritage and property rights in India.

Case: Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Varanasi vs Rakhi Singh and ors.

Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy