The Archaeological Survey of India has completed the extensive 100-day 'scientific survey' of the Gyanvapi mosque complex, as directed by a Varanasi court. However, they've requested an additional 15 days to compile and finalize their report before submission. This survey aims to determine if the mosque was constructed atop a pre-existing Hindu temple.

On Saturday, the Varanasi court is scheduled to review the request for an additional extension regarding the completion of the report on the Gyanvapi mosque complex survey.

The archaeological body was initially expected to submit its report on the Gyanvapi mosque complex last Monday, following an extension granted on November 2. ASI officials conveyed to the court that additional time was required to properly compile and organize the extensive findings from the survey.

The ASI conducted a comprehensive 'scientific survey' of the mosque premises situated adjacent to the renowned Kashi Vishwanath Temple. This survey aimed to investigate whether the 17th-century mosque was constructed on the site of a pre-existing Hindu temple.

Following the affirmation of the Varanasi court order by the Allahabad High Court, which deemed it "necessary in the interest of justice," the survey commenced. The High Court expressed that this survey would be beneficial for both parties involved in the matter.

In a previous hearing, the mosque management raised objections to the survey conducted by the ASI. They alleged that the ASI was excavating the basement and other areas within the complex without proper authorization. Furthermore, concerns were voiced regarding the accumulation of debris against the structure's western wall, posing a risk of potential damage and collapse.

The mosque committee had taken their case to the Supreme Court to contest the order issued by the Allahabad High Court. However, on August 4, the Supreme Court declined to grant a stay on the High Court's directive for the survey.

A bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, instructed the ASI to abstain from intrusive actions during the survey. This directive explicitly prohibited excavations, despite the Varanasi court's prior indication that such actions could be carried out as part of the survey process.