Delhi HC Issues Interim Order Restraining Entities from Infringing 'UPSTOX' Trademarks and Copyrighted Materials

Delhi HC Issues Interim Order Restraining Entities from Infringing 'UPSTOX' Trademarks and Copyrighted Materials

The Delhi High Court, in an interim order, has prohibited unidentified parties from infringing upon the 'UPSTOX' trademarks, work marks, and copyrighted photographs. 'UPSTOX' is an online trading application owned by RKSV Securities India Pvt. Ltd., an Indian brokerage firm offering stock trading services.

The plaintiff, RKSV Securities India Pvt. Ltd, stated that it, along with its group companies, owns and operates UPSTOX, a platform where investors engage in stock market trading as well as various investment and financial activities.

The plaintiff asserted that these operations are regulated by authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA), and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDAI).

RKSV highlighted its ongoing investments in marketing, branding, and strategic initiatives to enhance the recognition and trust associated with the Upstox brand. It further emphasized that the platform boasts over 1 crore customers and has built a strong reputation in the market.

RKSV Securities India Pvt. Ltd. alleged the infringement of its registered 'UPSTOX' trademarks, word marks, and copyright, as well as the act of passing off by unknown defendants (John Does/defendant no. 1). The plaintiff claimed it had been receiving multiple complaints regarding several domain names, WhatsApp groups, Facebook groups, and Telegram groups impersonating the company. These fraudulent entities were accused of deceiving clients and users by misusing the company's brand, logo, word mark, and copyrighted materials, leading to financial losses.

The plaintiff alleged that unknown defendants have registered multiple infringing domain names and are operating fake and fraudulent websites, WhatsApp, and Telegram groups under the name of RKSV with the intent to deceive unsuspecting customers. These fraudulent entities are said to be luring individuals with promises of various incentives related to stocks, IPOs, and other financial activities. The infringing domain names are registered with domain name registrars Gname, BIZCN, and JUMING (defendant nos. 2 to 4).

Taking into account the various documents presented by the plaintiff, which allegedly show the defendants' unauthorized use of its mark "to dupe and defraud people," Justice Mini Pushkarna, in her order, stated:

"In view of the above circumstances, the plaintiff has demonstrated a prima facie case for grant of injunction and in case no ex-parte ad-interim injunction is granted, the plaintiff will suffer an irreparable loss. Further, the balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants".

The plaintiff further alleged that the unknown defendants have been infringing its trademark and copyright with the sole motive of defrauding the company and its customers, thereby damaging its goodwill. It also highlighted that the infringement posed significant concerns regarding the security and privacy of its domain name, trade name, and logo.
 
The court, until the next date of hearing, restrained the unknown defendants from infringing upon the plaintiff's "UPSTOX trademarks, word marks, or any other deceptively similar marks," including its "domain names, websites, social media handles, hashtags, email addresses, bank accounts, or any business papers." Additionally, the court prohibited the unknown defendants from reproducing or publishing the plaintiff's copyrighted photographs of the UPSTOX brand.
 
The court further directed the domain name registrars (defendant nos. 2 to 4) to suspend the domain names of the unknown defendants and to disclose details, including KYC documents and payment information, of the registrant of the infringing domain names.
 
The court also directed several banks, including SBI, HDFC Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, and Bank of Maharashtra (defendant nos. 5 to 18), to freeze the bank accounts of the unknown defendants and to disclose the KYC documents and bank statements of the account holders and beneficiaries.
 
The court further directed Telegram to suspend all profiles, groups, and channels associated with the unknown defendants. 

The Court issued a notice to the defendants in the interim application and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 20, 2025. It also issued summons in the main lawsuit.

Case title: MS RKSV Securities India Pvt. Ltd. Upstox vs. John Does And Ors.

(CS(COMM) 1215/2024, I.A. 49976/2024)

Counsels for Plaintiff: Senior advocate Balbir Singh, with advocates M. P. Devnath, Abhishek Anand, Rahul Kumar, Karan Sachdev and Monica Benjamin

 

Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy