Bombay HC Grants Interim Relief to UTITSL: Injunction Order Targets Entities Operating Fake Websites Offering PAN Card Services

Bombay HC Grants Interim Relief to UTITSL: Injunction Order Targets Entities Operating Fake Websites Offering PAN Card Services

The Bombay High Court recently granted interim relief to UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited (UTITSL), a government-owned entity. In a significant move, the court issued an injunction order against both known and unknown entities accused of operating fraudulent websites. These websites falsely claim to provide PAN card issuance services on behalf of UTITSL.

While issuing an ex-parte order against more than 10 entities, the Bombay High Court emphasized the "national importance" of PAN services. The court highlighted that any potential misuse of the authorization in this context would pose a significant threat to both UTITSL and the national interest, considering the crucial role PAN services play in various financial and administrative transactions.

Observing that fake websites persistently remain operational, the Court underscored the potential for irreparable damage. It expressed concern over the severe compromise of valuable confidential data belonging to the plaintiff (UTITSL). Additionally, the Court recognized the broader national implications, emphasizing that the existence of such deceptive platforms poses a significant threat at a national level.

Highlighting the central government's mandate requiring PAN card holders to link their cards with Aadhar, a widely accepted proof of identification in India, the High Court emphasized that any potential misuse of the license or authorization to issue PAN cards would not only adversely impact the interests of the plaintiff (UTITSL) but also pose a significant threat to the national interest.

The court recognized the critical importance of safeguarding this process, given the intertwined nature of PAN and Aadhar in facilitating secure and reliable identification.

In light of the aforementioned concerns and recognizing the urgency of the situation, the High Court asserted that an interim ex-parte order was necessary. This decision was made without serving the plea to the defendants, highlighting the pressing need to swiftly address the potential threats associated with the alleged fraudulent activities and to prevent any further harm to UTITSL and the broader national interest.

On January 12, in response to an application filed by UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited (UTITSL), a single-judge bench led by Justice Bharati H Dangre issued an order. This order granted interim relief by restraining multiple companies and unidentified individuals from infringing upon the copyrighted label and mark owned by UTITSL.

UTI Infrastructure Technology and Services Limited (UTITSL) sought protection for its mark and label, emphasizing the "national importance" of the services it offers. Recognizing the significance of these services, the company pursued legal measures to safeguard its distinctive mark and label from potential infringement, highlighting the importance of preserving the integrity and authenticity of its offerings.

“It cannot be in dispute that the PAN system is of paramount importance on a national scale due to its multifaceted impact on governance, taxation, and financial integrity, and it can be said to be the cornerstone of a robust financial economic system,” the court said in its order.

The plaintiff company contended that the defendants were offering unauthorized, identical services and collecting personal and confidential data from citizens. Furthermore, the company asserted that the defendants misled individuals into making payments and engaged in the fabrication of public documents. This argument highlighted the serious allegations against the defendants, involving not only the unauthorized provision of services but also the potential misuse of sensitive information and fraudulent activities.

The bench scheduled the matter for further hearing on February 20 and specified that the interim order, which restrains the defendants, would remain in effect until the next hearing.

Share this News

Website designed, developed and maintained by webexy