The Supreme Court in a recent case has upheld the conviction of advocate Gulshan Bajwa in a long-standing criminal contempt case dating back seventeen years. Bajwa was found guilty by the Delhi High Court in 2006 for making improper and reckless allegations against judges, as well as repeatedly failing to appear before the court despite various attempts to secure his presence.

The Division Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and PS Narasimha, while hearing Bajwa's appeal, emphasized the importance of a sincere apology in cases of contempt. They reiterated that an apology must demonstrate genuine remorse and contriteness, rather than being used as a mere tactic to evade responsibility.

The High Court, in its ruling, noted several instances of Bajwa's contumacious conduct in various proceedings, emphasizing the intentional and malicious nature of his actions over a prolonged period. Despite Bajwa offering an apology, the court deemed it insincere and unsatisfactory, refusing to accept it.

Affirming the High Court's decision, the Supreme Court emphasized the paramount importance of maintaining the dignity and reputation of judicial officers, as well as safeguarding them from baseless allegations. The Court condemned Bajwa's pattern of misbehavior and threats towards judges who did not align with his views, stating that such conduct undermines the legal system.

While refusing to interfere with the High Court's judgment, the Supreme Court modified Bajwa's sentence in light of certain medical ailments, reducing it from three months of imprisonment to serving until the rising of the court.

Case: GULSHAN BAJWA vs. REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OR DELHI & ANR,

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 577/2007.

Click to read/download judgment.